We Stand FIRM
FIRM Home
Blog Home
Recent Comments
RSS Feed
Contributors
Lin Zinser
Ari Armstrong
Diana Hsieh
Paul Hsieh
E-mail all the bloggers
Blogroll
Principles in Practice
Capitalism Magazine
Free Market Cure
Patient Power
Health Care BS
KevinMD
NCPA Digest
Socialized Medicine
State House Call
Archives
January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008
|
 |  |  |
| Wednesday, March 19, 2008 |
More Massachusetts Problems
By Paul Hsieh, MD @ 12:01 AM 
The March 17, 2008 Boston Globe reports that the Massachusetts "universal health care" system is having a "catastrophic" effect on the Cambridge Health Alliance, which takes care of many of the poor and uninsured in the Boston area. The state plan pays for only "60 to 70 percent" of the cost of the care delivered, and "has left [the Cambridge Health Alliance] responsible for providing free care for those without insurance while reducing the hospitals' compensation for such services." The Cambridge Health Alliance is therefore being forced to fire staff and reduce patient services in order to stay solvent.
As we've seen in Canada and the UK, governments can make plenty of paper promises of "universal health care". But they can't deliver actual care. Once again, we see the following lessons:
1) "Universal" health care inevitably leads to rationing. This particular development is just one way which it can occur.
2) The rationing especially hurts those whom "universal care" was ostensibly supposed to help. This is just an instance of the broader principle that socialism and collectivism harms everyone, even the intended beneficiaries (i.e., "the people").
Massachusetts is starting to learning the lessons of those other countries the hard way.Labels: MA, States
E-mail Paul Hsieh, MD / PermaLink / Comments / Trackbacks / BlogThis
|
 |
|