We Stand FIRM
FIRM Home
Blog Home
Recent Comments
RSS Feed
Twitter: WeStandFIRM

Contributors
Lin Zinser
Ari Armstrong
Diana Hsieh
Paul Hsieh
E-mail all the bloggers

Blogroll
Principles in Practice
Capitalism Magazine
Patient Power
Medpolitics
Concierge Medicine MD
ReasonPharm
Health Care BS
Free Market Cure
KevinMD
John Goodman
Junkfood Science
Covert Rationing
NCPA Digest
Socialized Medicine
State House Call
Big Gov Health
WSJ Health Blog
Medical Progress Today
Derek Lowe
AFCM
Free Colorado
WASH
Heal Spiel
Health Policy Action Center
Lucidicus Project

Articles/Essays
"Health Care Is Not A Right"
"Moral Health Care vs. 'Universal Health Care'"
"Mandatory Health Insurance: Wrong For America"
"Universal Healthcare and the Waistline Police"
"The Right Vision of Health Care"
"FAQ on Free Market Health Insurance"

FIRM Debates Universal Healthcare on Opposing Views


Archives
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
 Friday, August 1, 2008
More Commonwealth Errors Debunked
By Paul Hsieh, MD @ 12:05 AM PermaLink

A couple of weeks ago, the Commonwealth Fund released yet another report sharply critical of US health care, claiming that we ranked 19th out of 19 Western Countries, supposedly worse than Greece, Spain, Portugal, and Italy.

Fortunately, Linda Gorman of the Independence Institute has written a devastating critique of the Commonwealth study entitled, "Commonwealth Ranking: Are We Really 19th Out of 19?". She discusses numerous methodological problems with their report, including:
Choosing Nonmedical Benchmarks
Cherry-Picking the Benchmarks
Using Questionable Benchmarks
Equating Low Spending with Efficiency
Using Questionable Measurements
Confusing "Access" with "Third-Party Insurance"
Ignoring Self-Insurance
Ignoring Assets
Applying the Commonwealth Criteria of "Underinsured" to the Medicare Population
Ignoring Rationing by Waiting
Misusing Statistics.
Each of those points is covered in greater detail.

She also discusses a number of measures in which the US has improved between 2006 and 2008, but which were not regarded as significant by the Commonwealth Fund, including:
1. Deaths per 100,000 population fell.
2. Infant mortality fell.
3. Higher percentages of adults and children received recommended preventive care.
4. Higher percentages of diabetics and hypertensive adults had better blood sugar and blood pressure control.
5. A higher percentage of hospital patients received recommended care.
6. A higher percentage of heart failure patients received written discharge instructions. (This is a process measure, whether it improves outcomes is unknown.)
7. A slightly lower percentage of patients reported medical, medication, or lab test errors.
8. A lower percentage of children were prescribed antibiotics for a sore throat without first getting a strep test.
9. A smaller percentage of short-stay nursing home residents developed pressure sores.
10. A higher percentage of patients reported that doctor-patient communication was adequate.
11. A higher percentage of adults reported that they had no cost barriers to health care access.
12. Actual to expected deaths for hospital mortality ratios fell from 101 to 82.
For those who are interested in the details, I highly recommend reading the whole thing.

As John Goodman points out, "On his way to get health care at the Cleveland Clinic, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Burlesconi probably flew over a half dozen higher ranking countries, not to mention his own. What could he possibly have been thinking? Doesn't he read Commonwealth reports?"

Labels: ,

E-mail Paul Hsieh, MD / PermaLink / Comments / Trackbacks / BlogThis