We Stand FIRM
FIRM Home
Blog Home
Recent Comments
RSS Feed
Twitter: WeStandFIRM
Contributors
Lin Zinser
Ari Armstrong
Diana Hsieh
Paul Hsieh
E-mail all the bloggers
Blogroll
Principles in Practice
Capitalism Magazine
Patient Power
Medpolitics
Concierge Medicine MD
ReasonPharm
Health Care BS
Free Market Cure
KevinMD
John Goodman
Junkfood Science
Covert Rationing
NCPA Digest
Socialized Medicine
State House Call
Big Gov Health
WSJ Health Blog
Medical Progress Today
Derek Lowe
Seamus Muldoon
AFCM
Free Colorado
Dr. Donald May
Heal Spiel
Health Policy Action Center
Lucidicus Project
Articles/Essays:
"Health Care Is Not A Right"
"FAQ on Free Market Health Insurance"
More Articles/Editorials
Archives
January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010
|
 |  |  |
| Thursday, November 12, 2009 |
Maine Still In Trouble
By Paul Hsieh, MD @ 12:15 AM 
Maine's attempt at universal health care gets less media coverage than Massachusetts'. However, the November 10, 2009 New York Times reports that it's still in trouble.
Here's an excerpt from their article, "Maine Finds a Health Care Fix Elusive":Maine is the Charlie Brown of health care. The state's legislators have tried for decades to fix its system, but their efforts have always fallen short: health insurance premiums are still among the least affordable in the nation, health care spending per person is among the highest and hospital emergency rooms are among the most crowded. Indeed, many overhauls to the system have done little more than squeeze a balloon -- solving one problem while worsening another.
...Maine's history is a cautionary tale for national health reform. The state could never figure out how to slow the spiraling increase in medical costs, hobbling its efforts to offer more people insurance coverage. Many on Capitol Hill have criticized national reform legislation for similarly doing little to tame costs. (Read the full text of "Maine Finds a Health Care Fix Elusive".)
Although the details differ from Massachusetts, the problems are very similar. Despite massive government regulations, costs continue to rise, patients continue to have a hard time getting access to care, and doctors are getting squeezed by low reimbursement. In other words, their statist policies are making things worse, not better.
Will the rest of the country learn from Maine's experience, or will we adopt those same failed policies at the national level?Labels: ME, States
E-mail Paul Hsieh, MD / PermaLink / Comments / Trackbacks / BlogThis
|
 |
| Thursday, October 8, 2009 |
WSJ: The Lesson of State Health-Care Reforms
By Paul Hsieh, MD @ 12:05 AM 
In the October 6, 2009 Wall Street Journal, Peter Suderman reviews "The Lesson of State Health-Care Reforms".
Let's go through the list of states that attempted Obama-like policies in the past:New York - FAIL Massachusetts - FAIL Maine - FAIL Tennessee - FAIL Suderman concludes:Despite these state-level failures, President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats are pushing forward a slate of similar reforms. Unlike most high-school science fair participants, they seem unaware that the point of doing experiments is to identify what actually works. Instead, they've identified what doesn't -- and decided to do it again. (Read the full text of "The Lesson of State Health-Care Reforms".)Labels: MA, ME, NY, OpEd, States, TN
E-mail Paul Hsieh, MD / PermaLink / Comments / Trackbacks / BlogThis
|
 |
| Friday, August 21, 2009 |
Remember Maine (Part 2)?
By Paul Hsieh, MD @ 8:45 AM 
Last year, we noticed that Maine's universal health care plan was failing.
Today's (August 21, 2009) Wall Street Journal reports that Maine's troubles are worsening.
Apparently, the combination of a "public plan" (called DirigoChoice), strict regulations on insurers specifying who they must accept, and subsidies for low-income patients seems not to be working. Yet this is precisely what's being proposed at the national level!
An excerpt from their piece, "No Maine Miracle Cure":...Then the state created a "public option" known as DirigoChoice. (Dirigo is the state motto, meaning "I Lead.") This plan would compete with private plans such as Blue Cross. To entice lower income Mainers to enroll, it offered taxpayer-subsidized premiums. The plan's original funding source was $50 million of federal stimulus money the state got in 2003. Over time, the plan was to be "paid for by savings in the health-care system." This is precisely the promise of ObamaCare. Maine saved by squeezing payments to hospitals and physicians.
The program flew off track fast. At its peak in 2006, only about 15,000 people had enrolled in the DirigoChoice program. That number has dropped to below 10,000, according to the state's own reporting. About two-thirds of those who enrolled already had insurance, which they dropped in favor of the public option and its subsidies. Instead of 128,000 uninsured in the program today, the actual number is just 3,400. Despite the giant expansions in Maine's Medicaid program and the new, subsidized public choice option, the number of uninsured in the state today is only slightly lower that in 2004 when the program began.
...This problem was exacerbated because since the early 1990s Maine has required insurers to adhere to community rating and guaranteed issue, which requires that insurers cover anyone who applies, regardless of their health condition and at a uniform premium. These rules—which are in the Obama plan—have relentlessly driven up insurance costs in Maine, especially for healthy people.
The Maine Heritage Policy Center, which has tracked the plan closely, points out that largely because of these insurance rules, a healthy male in Maine who is 30 and single pays a monthly premium of $762 in the individual market; next door in New Hampshire he pays $222 a month. The Granite State doesn't have community rating and guaranteed issue. The WSJ concludes:...Unlike the federal government, Maine has a balanced budget requirement. So out of fiscal necessity, the state has now capped the enrollment in the program and allowed no new entrants. Now there is a waiting list. DirigoChoice has become yet another expensive, failed experiment in government-run health care, alongside similar fiascoes in Massachusetts and Tennessee. Waiting lists, skyrocketing costs, and a failure to actually guarantee "access" -- who could have predicted that these would be the results of government intervention in health care and health insurance?Labels: Insurance, ME, States
E-mail Paul Hsieh, MD / PermaLink / Comments / Trackbacks / BlogThis
|
 |
| Friday, August 29, 2008 |
Remember Maine?
By Paul Hsieh, MD @ 12:05 AM 
Before Massachusetts implemented their "universal" health care plan, the state of Maine had attempted a plan to guarantee coverage for all the uninsured, called Dirigo.
Now, unhappy Maine residents are protesting yet another tax hike to fund their system, especially after the program was sold to Maine residents as not requiring any new taxes. Nor did the program do much to reduce the problem of the uninsured, as the article notes:Dirigo Care has cost the state's taxpayers nearly $164 million in the four years since its inception. Although its intended purpose was to insure 128,000 people who had no health coverage, only 4 percent of that total, or just over 5,000 individuals, have been successfully removed from the rolls of the uninsured and into the state program, according to figures from the Maine Heritage Policy Center. In 2007, the New York Times described Dirigo as "faltering".
In June 2008, others are using the words "boondoggle" and "failure":DirigoChoice costs taxpayers $2,977 per enrollee per year just for the premium subsidy, excluding Dirigo Health Agency administrative costs.
As of April 2008, there were 12,637 individuals covered by DirigoChoice, less than 1 percent of the state’s population.
Only 31 percent of DirigoChoice enrollees -- 3,917 -- were previously uninsured for at least 12 months prior to enrollment. That is only 3.2 percent of the state’s uninsured population.
The marginal cost to state taxpayers is $9,603 to subsidize the coverage for one previously uninsured person through DirigoChoice.
Maine’s uninsured rate from 2003 to 2006, the latest year available, is virtually unchanged – 128,000 uninsured in 2003, 115,000 in 2004, 132,000 in 2005, 122,000 in 2006.
The Dirigo Health Agency’s administrative costs were $3.7 million in calendar year 2007.
Because of financial difficulties, DirigoChoice was closed to new enrollees on Sept. 1, 2007.
The 1.8 percent health care claims tax, which was included in the tax increase package approved by the Legislature, will cost individuals about $78 and families about $210 a year in higher health care premiums.
Without the $57 to $72 million tax increase, DirigoChoice enrollment is projected to drop by 4,000 individuals. Even with the tax increase, DirigoChoice enrollment still is projected to drop by 1,000 people.
The Dirigo Health experience has cost Maine taxpayers more than $100 million since 2005.
Dirigo Health was supposed to make health insurance more affordable and provide coverage for most of Maine’s uninsured. In fact, it has done neither. This is the predictable result of government-guaranteed health care.Labels: ME, States
E-mail Paul Hsieh, MD / PermaLink / Comments / Trackbacks / BlogThis
|
 |
| Thursday, February 7, 2008 |
Maine's Failed Universal System
By Paul Hsieh, MD @ 12:01 AM 
StateHouseCall.org reports on more problems with Maine's attempt at universal health care:Maine has recently joined the growing list of failed state reforms. As with other faillures, the Dirigo Care program was shoved down the throats of a bewildered legislature by an egotistical governor who promised Nirvana.
...But look behind the spin and the report is a devastating examination of a program that was poorly conceived and doomed to fail from the beginning – as many of us had predicted. It finds: 1. After 20 months of operation only 11,000 were enrolled in DirigoChoice (out of a total uninsured population of 136,000), and over two-thirds of these were already covered. 2. Of the small companies eligible to participate, only 2.5% actually did. 3. The financing scheme (a “savings offset payment”) is impossible to measure or implement. 4. Almost as many people (3,600) had disenrolled from the program as were newly insured by it. Of course, these are continuations of the same problems reported by the New York Times in their April 30, 2007 article, "As Health Plan Falters, Maine Explores Changes".
Ironically, Maine and Hawaii are the two states cited by the left-leaning Commonwealth Fund as having the top two government "universal" health systems. If that's the case, I'd hate to see the badly-run systems.
The key problem, of course, is that the government cannot and should not run universal health care systems, because that necessarily involves violating the individual rights of patients, doctors, and insurers, by forbidding them from contracting for vital goods and services to their mutual advantage according to their own best rational judgment. These undesirable economic consequences are the inevitable result of such government interference in the free market.Labels: ME, States
E-mail Paul Hsieh, MD / PermaLink / Comments / Trackbacks / BlogThis
|
 |
| Monday, April 30, 2007 |
Problems With Maine's Socialized Medical System
By Paul Hsieh, MD @ 4:44 PM 
The state of Maine has also attempted to provide "universal coverage" for its residents for many years, with predictably poor results. According to this recent NY Times article, instead of saving money, the program costs continue to explode, and the state officials are considering what sort of cutbacks to implement. Rationing is just one short step away.
Interestingly enough, one of the supporters of the plan is quite explicit about the central problem. She states, "This program needs healthy people who don't get subsidized so it can prosper." In other words, it needs a massive forced redistribution of wealth from one group of citizens to pay for the health care of another group of citizens who otherwise couldn't pay for it themselves.
Yet for some reason, supporters of "universal health care" refuse to call these systems by their real name -- "socialized medicine"! (Via Jason Spears.)Labels: ME, States
E-mail Paul Hsieh, MD / PermaLink / Comments / Trackbacks / BlogThis
|
 |
|